Week 3

Week 3: 

 

S/No 

Brief Description of Idea (Include sketches, if appropriate) 

SCAMPER Word used 

E.g. 

Curry puff skin but substitute the curry potato fillings to custard 

Substitute 

1 

  • Combine and build in a test tube shaker inside to shake the mixture.  

Combine 

 

  • Self-circulation device by using pump to suck water into the test tube. 

  • Eliminates the need of scooping water into the test tube.  

Eliminate  

 

  • Self-cleaning device eliminates the need to clean the test tube after each use.  

Eliminate 

4 

 Underwater device: - attach the colorimeter to the side of a fish tank 

  • In built suction device to suck water inside 

  • Sensor inside the underwater colorimeter to detect phosphate levels from water. 

 Adapt 

5 

Reverse process colorimeter 

  • function to suck water into the colorimeter 

  • instead of pouring water in, water will be the first component 

  • Add chemical to water and process in colorimeter 

Reverse 

 

IDEA SCREENING (FEASBILITY ANALYSIS) 

Idea 1: Combine and build in a test tube shaker inside to shake the mixture. 

 

YES 

NO 

Budget -Less than S$2000? 

  

  

Project Timeline- Can be completed within one semester? 

  

  

Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. 

  

  

  • Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? 

  

  

  • Are the required utilities available? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? 

  

  

  • Does it need any computer software and hardware? 

  

  

  • Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? 

  

  

Operational Feasibility 

  

  

  1. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it legal to operate the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it safe to operate the project? 

  

  

 

Idea 2: Self-circulation device by using pump to suck water into the test tube. Eliminates the need of scooping water into the test tube. 

 

YES 

NO 

Budget -Less than S$2000? 

  

  

Project Timeline- Can be completed within one semester? 

  

  

Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. 

  

  

  • Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? 

  

  

  • Are the required utilities available? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? 

  

  

  • Does it need any computer software and hardware? 

  

  

  • Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? 

  

  

Operational Feasibility 

  

  

  1. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it legal to operate the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it safe to operate the project? 

  

 

 

Idea 3: Self-cleaning device eliminates the need to clean the test tube after each use 

YES 

NO 

Budget -Less than S$2000? 

  

  

Project Timeline- Can be completed within one semester? 

  

  

Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. 

  

  

  • Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? 

  

  

  • Are the required utilities available? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? 

  

  

  • Does it need any computer software and hardware? 

  

  

  • Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? 

  

  

Operational Feasibility 

  

  

  1. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it legal to operate the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it safe to operate the project? 

  

 

 

 

Idea 4: Underwater device 

YES 

NO 

Budget -Less than S$2000? 

  

  

Project Timeline- Can be completed within one semester? 

  

  

Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. 

  

  

  • Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? 

  

  

  • Are the required utilities available? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? 

  

  

  • Does it need any computer software and hardware? 

  

  

  • Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? 

  

  

Operational Feasibility 

  

  

  1. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it legal to operate the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it safe to operate the project? 

  

 

 

 

 

Idea 5: Reverse process colorimeter 

 

YES 

NO 

Budget -Less than S$2000? 

  

  

Project Timeline- Can be completed within one semester? 

  

  

Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. 

  

  

  • Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology? 

  

  

  • Are the required utilities available? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have necessary testing and fabrication equipment? 

  

  

  • Does it need any computer software and hardware? 

  

  

  • Do we possess the necessary technical expertise and skills? 

  

  

  • Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project? 

  

  

Operational Feasibility 

  

  

  1. Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it legal to operate the project? 

  

  

  1. Is it safe to operate the project? 

  

 

 

Criteria 

Weightages 

Options 

 

Idea 1: 

Combine and build in a test tube shaker inside to shake the mixture. 

 

Idea 2: 

Self-circulation device by using pump to suck water into the test tube. Eliminates the need of scooping water into the test tube. 

 

Idea 3: 

Reverse process colorimeter 

Idea 4: 

Underwater device 

Raw 

Score 

Weighted 

Score 

Raw 

Score 

Weighted 

Score 

Raw 

Score 

Weighted 

Score 

Raw 

Score 

 

Weighted 

Score 

  1. Time required to make the design 

20% 

4 

80% 

3 

60% 

2 

40% 

1 

20% 

  1. Cost-benefit 

30% 

4 

120% 

3 

90% 

2 

 60% 

1 

30% 

  1. Feasibility 

20% 

4 

 80% 

3 

 60% 

2 

40% 

1 

20% 

  1. Usefulness/ Realistic 

20% 

1 

 20% 

2 

 40% 

3 

 60% 

4 

80% 

  1. Reach of impact 

10% 

4 

 40% 

3 

30% 

1 

10% 

2 

20% 

Score 

 100% 

13 

 340% 

11 

 280% 

9 

210% 

7 

170% 

 

As a result of the comparison, Idea 1, which is to combine and build in a test tube shaker, is the most suitable idea as it has the highest score. It requires little time to make the design, best cost –benefit, highest feasibility as well as the highest reach of impact. 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment